欢喜俏冤家

8.0|昨天23:28|已完结
简介:
汉森(凯文·贝肯 Kevin Bacon 饰)是一名保守党专栏作家,凭借着自己英俊的外表和肚子里的墨水,汉森处处留情,俨然一副花花公子的模样。布莱尔(伊丽莎白·帕金斯 Elizabeth Perkins 饰)是自由党专栏作家,她的感情观是从一而终,至死不渝。这两个仿佛是正负电极般的两个截然相反的人,他们共同在太阳报工作,自然而然的,大到三观小到日常琐碎,这两个人在每一件事情上都持有着相反的态度。  当他们的“美名”传到了当地电视台的耳中后,电视台决定为他们专门开设一档节目,在节目里,两人可以以自己的立场对时事发表意见。刚开始,节目现场洋溢着浓烈的火药味,但随着时间的推移,汉森和布莱尔都发现,对方并不是自己想象中的那么不可理喻。
猜你喜欢
换一换
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
109
9.0
已完结
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
9.0
更新时间:前天13:21
主演:未知
简介:Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.  These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.  Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.  Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.  Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.  The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.  Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.  The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.  This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.  The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...  Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�  Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.  Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.  On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.  Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.  Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.  Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.  Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.  The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.  What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.  Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.  Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.  Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.  Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.  Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.  Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.  Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept  Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.  Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.  Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.  Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.  Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.  Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.  The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.  To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point  Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.  1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
2961
1959
关于在短时间内的某几个人的经过
主演:
城市岛屿
494
7.0
已完结
城市岛屿
7.0
更新时间:昨天16:34
主演:安迪·加西亚,朱丽安娜· 玛格丽丝,史蒂文·斯崔特,艾米莉·莫迪默,埃兹拉·米勒,多米尼克·加西亚-洛里多,Carrie Baker Reynolds,Hope Glendon-Ross,艾伦·阿金,路易斯·穆斯蒂略,Jee Young Han,Sarah Saltzberg,寇蒂斯·库克,Sharon Angela,Marianne Ebert
简介:纽约附近城岛的监狱看守文斯(安迪·加西亚 Andy Garcia 饰)瞒着老婆乔伊斯(朱丽安娜· 玛格丽丝 Julianna Margulies 饰)到城里上表演课,梦想成为一名演员。乔伊斯瞒着文斯抽烟,女儿和儿子也都有自己的大小秘密,一家人各自为政。有一天文斯发现新转来的犯人汤尼(史蒂文·斯崔特 Steven Strait 饰)竟是自己遗弃二十多年的儿子。文斯把汤尼带回了家,向所有人隐瞒了事实,希望能利用假释好好照顾这个儿子,让他重返正途。与此同时,在表演课同学莫莉(艾米莉·莫迪默 Emily Mortimer 饰)的鼓励下,文斯参加了一次重要的电影角色面试,没想到这却引起了乔伊斯的误会,造成了家庭危机大爆发……  本片获纽约曼哈顿特里贝卡(Tribeca)电影节观众票选奖。
6720
2009
城市岛屿
主演:安迪·加西亚,朱丽安娜· 玛格丽丝,史蒂文·斯崔特,艾米莉·莫迪默,埃兹拉·米勒,多米尼克·加西亚-洛里多,Carrie Baker Reynolds,Hope Glendon-Ross,艾伦·阿金,路易斯·穆斯蒂略,Jee Young Han,Sarah Saltzberg,寇蒂斯·库克,Sharon Angela,Marianne Ebert
纽约我爱你
17
7.0
HD中字
纽约我爱你
7.0
更新时间:02月08日 02:13
主演:海登·克里斯滕森,娜塔莉·波特曼,奥兰多·布鲁姆,克里斯蒂娜·里奇,李美琪,伊桑·霍克,克里斯·库珀,罗宾·怀特,安东·叶利钦,奥莉薇·瑟尔比,布莱德利·库珀,德瑞·德·玛泰,希亚·拉博夫,朱莉·克里斯蒂,约翰·赫特,泰勒·吉蕾,舒淇,乌吾尔·宇杰尔,埃里·瓦拉赫,克萝丽丝·利奇曼,安迪·加西亚,布蕾克·莱弗利,伊尔凡·可汗
简介:

  数不尽的摩天大楼,看不完的车水马龙,这里便是不可思议的纽约。怀揣各种梦想的人们,来自不同地域,处于不同境遇,他们巧遇在街头的小酒馆,邂逅在街角的路灯下,因为好奇而交谈,因为寂寞而吸引,在那个充满巧合的城市,演泽着别样的风情与不同浪漫。
  本片由12个小短片混剪而成,是继《巴黎我爱你》之后的第二部“爱情城市”系列电影。十二位导演用自己独特的视角重新造访这座城市,他们用自己独特的方式展示了对于纽约的原创性看法。制片埃曼纽班毕伊表示此系列电影还将继续推出,2010年他们的目标锁定里约热内卢和上海两座城市。

1316
2008
纽约我爱你
主演:海登·克里斯滕森,娜塔莉·波特曼,奥兰多·布鲁姆,克里斯蒂娜·里奇,李美琪,伊桑·霍克,克里斯·库珀,罗宾·怀特,安东·叶利钦,奥莉薇·瑟尔比,布莱德利·库珀,德瑞·德·玛泰,希亚·拉博夫,朱莉·克里斯蒂,约翰·赫特,泰勒·吉蕾,舒淇,乌吾尔·宇杰尔,埃里·瓦拉赫,克萝丽丝·利奇曼,安迪·加西亚,布蕾克·莱弗利,伊尔凡·可汗
工作
286
8.0
已完结
工作
8.0
更新时间:1小时前
主演:Loredana Detto,Sandro Panseri,Mara Revel,图利奥·凯齐赫
简介:年轻的多蒙利冒险从小镇来到米兰,在一家大公司里找了一份工作,面对巨大的生活压力与温柔美丽的艾多丽使他很矛盾,为了心中的理想多蒙利只有忘我地工作,希望能够赢得艾多丽,现实的生活让他突然一夜之间失去了许多,他才发现自己是生活在社会最底层的人,极度的愤怒让他讨厌一切。  导演奥米建立风格和信誉的早期写实作品,叙述了一个15岁乡下男孩到米兰的大公司谋职的经过。男孩多米尼克在求职过程中结识了一个女孩,她也在等待被录用,在经历了各种考验后,两人最终如愿进入了这家公司。多米尼克凭借自己不断的勤奋努力,成为办公室主管,但他仍不满足,对生活和前途充满勃勃野心。  影片展示了意大利社会生活的艰辛,讽刺了谋职的贪婪,还提出了一个很耐人寻味的问题,那就是工业社会的紧张、单调与葬送青春、泯灭纯真。全片注重的是日常生活的细节描写,还原了一个小职员普通生活和工作的心理真实。导演没有过多把自己对生活的评价放进电影,他只是以“生活流”手法白描了这样一个普通的故事,纪实的风格朴实无华。
7328
1961
工作
主演:Loredana Detto,Sandro Panseri,Mara Revel,图利奥·凯齐赫
纯洁心灵:逐梦演艺圈
502
8.0
正片
纯洁心灵:逐梦演艺圈
8.0
更新时间:昨天00:04
主演:朱一文,李彦漫,陈思瀚,张芷榕,毕志飞,蒋龙,薛皓,王渊慧,辛祚宇,兰海隆,姜珮瑶,郭庭,王笑一,马瑜遥,张琳然,刘子铭,王曲浩然,杨佳佳,刘玲钰
简介:

海亚影视学院(虚构)近些年已经跻身国内著名影视院校的行列,其表演系2013级本科班,学生形象、艺术条件都格外突出,从入校伊始就备受学校师生关注,被誉为“准明星班”。班主任文天阳年青英俊,刚刚硕士毕业留校,认真负责。班里共有17名学生,8男9女,家庭背景、成长经历、性格各异:有的学生家里条件优越,有奢华海边别墅、游艇与跑车;有的学生是普通工薪阶层的子女;还有学生来自落后偏远山区的少数民族;还有学生是单亲家庭的问题子女……能在千军万马中成功杀出而考取表演专业,是备受人们关注的。他们是天之骄子,热情澎湃,都在自己最美好的青春年华,为自己的美好梦想奋斗着。演员是一个相对被动的职业,经常需要见组和推销自己,学习表演专业的学生也难免要比普通专业学生与社会有更多、更早的接触。城市中有着很多诱惑,影视圈也同样复杂,他们的青春美貌也吸引了形形色色的人士们的目光。文老师与自己的学生们在四年的历程中曾经沮丧过、伤心过甚至大痛过,但是青春这趟旅程,含着眼泪也要向前!他们决心闯入演艺圈并有所作为……

3568
2015
纯洁心灵:逐梦演艺圈
主演:朱一文,李彦漫,陈思瀚,张芷榕,毕志飞,蒋龙,薛皓,王渊慧,辛祚宇,兰海隆,姜珮瑶,郭庭,王笑一,马瑜遥,张琳然,刘子铭,王曲浩然,杨佳佳,刘玲钰

欢喜俏冤家

扫一扫手机看
复制
首页
电影
连续剧
综艺
动漫
短剧
体育
资讯